Healthed CPD · Gold Coast GP briefing

Cognitive assessment tools: choose the right screen, use it properly

Domains of cognition, SCD → MCI → dementia, GPCOG, MMSE plus clock, MoCA (encoding vs retrieval), RUDAS, and when a “normal” screen is a red flag.

Healthed Medical Update · Brisbane · 5 September 2026 · ~23 min lecture

Dr Rebecca Moore
Introduced in the Australian Dementia Network context. Credentials beyond the transcript are not invented here.

Big take-homes

Clinic rule

Choose the right tool for the right person, and use it properly. Cognitive screens are helpful for diagnosis in context — but they are not diagnostic tests on their own, and they are not population screening tools.

In the room, about a third to half of GPs said they perform a cognitive assessment about once a week; roughly half do it themselves and half use the practice nurse. Formal training in which tool and how to interpret it is often thin — this talk fills that gap.

What cognition actually is

Memory is what most people think of first. The brain is bigger than that. A useful screen looks across several domains so you get a clearer picture of what is going on.

Cognitive domains map Cognition not only memory Visuospatial space · navigation Recall / hippocampus encode new memory Executive plan · judgment · flexibility Attention focus · multitask Language word-find · syntax Motor / praxis tools · motor control Social / personality behaviour change
Cover the map, not only memory: visuospatial, hippocampal recall, executive, attention, language, motor/praxis, and social/personality.

Normal aging → SCD → MCI → dementia

Normal aging is a bit like a computer slowing down. Processing and multitasking take longer, but the information is still there.

Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) — you feel word-finding slips or more careless errors, but others have not noticed, and formal screens are normal. Flag and review these people: there is a small associated risk of later dementia, but most do not progress.

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is where we want the diagnosis made. Others notice problems; screens are worse than expected for that person; but function remains intact (ADLs done normally — maybe with more lists and calendar prompts). That intact function is the distinguishing line from dementia.

Dementia — function is impaired.

MCI outcomes

MCI has many causes: mood, grief, medications, metabolic issues, sleep apnoea, through to a prodrome of dementia. Some MCI reverses, many stay stable, and about 40–50% progress to dementia — that is the cohort we most want to identify.

Function axis from normal aging through SCD, MCI, and dementia Function intact ←——————————————→ Function impaired Normal aging slower processing content still there SCD self-noticed only screens normal MCI objective change function intact Dementia function impaired ADLs affected ~40–50% of MCI → dementia · some reverse · many remain stable
The hard line between MCI and dementia is everyday function — not the screen score alone.

Patterns by dementia type

TypeWhat often shows early
Alzheimer’s Hippocampal / short-term memory; often early language fluency, executive, and visuospatial change too.
Vascular Can hit anywhere — mixed picture on assessment.
Lewy body Memory components often relatively OK; visuospatial often affected early.
Frontotemporal (FTD) Younger onset; behaviour and personality. May pass cognitive screens — delayed diagnosis and false reassurance. Behaviour change + family concern + good scores = red flag → refer.

Tools are not diagnostic

Good tools are objective and reproducible over time and between operators. They are not diagnostic by themselves, and they should not be used as carte blanche population screening. Best use: someone with cognitive concerns, or case-finding in that context.

Choosing GPCOG, MMSE plus clock, MoCA, or RUDAS Cognitive concern or case-finding? GPCOG ~5 min only validated >75 screen + informant Q if needed MMSE + clock familiar · add clock always gaps: VS / exec / fluency MoCA more sensitive for MCI +1 if ≤12 yrs schooling Low education / ESL? → RUDAS (interpreter sits beside you) Not diagnostic · not population screening · history + collateral still win
Match the tool to the person: GPCOG for many over-75 checks; MMSE with a clock; MoCA when subtle MCI is the question; RUDAS when education or English is a barrier.

GPCOG

Takes about five minutes, scored out of nine. Starts with remembering a name and address; includes a plot-drawing task. It is the only validated screening tool in the over-75 population — useful in the over-75 health check or driving assessments when you expect someone to be well. Nine out of nine is fairly reassuring. If the score is worse than expected, use the informant questionnaire, follow the investigation suggestions, and move to a more in-depth screen.

MMSE and clock drawing

The MMSE is embedded in software and familiar from medical school — but map it against the domain slide and the gaps show: little on visuospatial (overlapping pentagons only), little executive beyond the three-stage command, and very little language fluency.

Two big MMSE issues

It is not particularly sensitive to subtle change. People with higher education often score well even with significant underlying impairment. For subtle change, prefer MoCA — and if you do MMSE, always add a clock drawing task.

Clock drawing hits visuospatial domains and the abstract concept of drawing time (executive). Choose a time that uses both sides of the clock (excludes hemispheric neglect / field loss). 10 past 11 is among the hardest: you must recode “10” as the 2 position, and 10 and 11 sit close together — a stimulus-response trap for executive dysfunction. Poor clocks are also visually persuasive for sceptical family.

One practical scoring approach (many exist): point for the circle; point for the right numbers; point for spacing (break into four quadrants — right numbers in each); point for hands in correct position and length. Example from the talk: two out of three when hand lengths were wrong.

MoCA deep dive

MoCA is much more sensitive for mild cognitive impairment. Training was historically encouraged and is expensive; it is not really mandatory now. Download as PDF; use different versions if testing more often than three-monthly to reduce practice effect. Multiple languages and a blind version exist. It takes a little longer until you are fluent with it.

Trail-making

Complex: visuospatial + executive + attention — all relevant to driving. A larger trail-making PDF up to 13 is helpful for impaired cognition and driving assessment. Patient joins number–letter in ascending order (1-A, 2-B…).

Serial 7s, abstraction, schooling

Five-word memory — encoding vs retrieval

Harder than MMSE: five words, longer delay. Present about one per second; free recall twice after learning (instructions may be repeated only once). After intervening tasks, free recall: only uncued words count toward the final score. Then category cue (e.g. colour, flower), then multiple-choice if needed.

Uncued recall vs category cue vs multiple choice MoCA 5-word memory: only uncued items score 1. Uncued free recall → final score 2. Category cue “it was a colour…” retrieval help 3. Multiple choice three options last retrieval probe Cued success → more retrieval problem · Never with cues → encoding problem (more AD-suggestive) Grammar/syntax errors on sentence repeat = zero · Letter fluency (not names/places/numbers) is telling
Encoding failure (no benefit from cues) is more significant and more suggestive of Alzheimer’s-type change than a pure retrieval problem — though retrieval issues still matter.

RUDAS

Especially helpful for lower education or English as a second language — more everyday tasks. Shopping list remembered with up to five repetitions; more praxis (show me your right foot; which is my left knee); animal fluency in one minute. Validated for use with an interpreter — sit the interpreter beside you so non-verbal cues reach the participant.

Other tools worth knowing

Cases: Sarah and Greg

Sarah — anxiety masking early Alzheimer’s

Well-educated woman, 67, new to the area, hearing loss, significant anxiety. Increasingly anxious socially; hard to follow conversations; couldn’t remember names; had to concentrate hard on simple tasks. MMSE scored well — anxiety was treated. She worsened. Neuropsychiatry later diagnosed stage 1 Alzheimer’s. Mood disorders (anxiety or depression) often appear as a prodrome. Lesson: good history and collateral; a MoCA would have been more helpful than MMSE alone.

Greg — poor Trail B, good RUDAS, not dementia

Geriatrics registrar case: diligent GP referred Greg after a terrible Trail Making B on a driving assessment. Neither he nor his wife had cognitive concerns. Left school at year 8; lifelong builder’s labourer. Scored well on RUDAS. Conclusion: likely underlying learning disability affecting trail-making — not cognitive impairment. Right tool, plus history and examination, still matter.

Closing line

Choose the right tool for the job, in the context of a good history and examination. Cognitive tools themselves are not diagnostic tests.

DTA resources

Dementia Training Australia (DTA) was flagged with a QR code in the room: podcast and further resources for clinicians wanting deeper training.

drkotha.com · cognitive-assessment.drkotha.com